观后感 手机站

泰坦尼克号观后感英文100字|泰坦尼克号观后感英文范文

时间:2018-01-09 05:39:41 观后感 投诉建议

  《泰坦尼克号》是美国二十世纪福斯电影公司、派拉蒙影业公司出品爱情片。以下是由小编整理关于泰坦尼克号观后感英文的内容,希望大家喜欢!

  泰坦尼克号观后感英文(一)

  “Titanic” Once More

  Maybe every body would like to pack into the ship, Titanic, spareing no effort, but they didn’t notice that while they have one food in the ship, but the other food they have in death.

  Or maybe we should be braver, to fill more exciting and real things in the life which look like the death water. Even if in all life long we only have a real love, we can still smile in the darkness: “you promise me, you will never give up” and them close your eyes, and be happy after that because your beloved husband or wife is happy.

  As for me, Titanic is great not only because of the great and ever-lasting love, but also the issues, how to choose-----live or die, to be or not to be, that’s a question. Anybody who can ensure the person, who uses the harmful methods or even the evil methods in order to escape from the ship, can live a good life in the future? Anybody who can ensure the women, who are afraid of danger so that they were not willing to reverse the ship to help her husband and the others husbands, have he courage to face to their children and the kids father. Human nature, likes the decayed fruits in summer at the moment, naked ugly in front of us. The lost soul frosted in the sea, will murmur for ever with their story. What will accompany them? Maybe there were only the ever-lasting regret and the sudden shout of surprise nightmare of the living person.

  I want to live, live in a peaceful life. If not, I would like to drop off peacefully in my sleep. Just like the violin, with remote melody, to release the souls of the dead deeply anxious.

  泰坦尼克号观后感英文(二)

  I suppose there's something faintly ridiculous about a $200-million movie that argues on behalf of true love over wealth and even bandies about a precious diamond as a central narrative device--like Citizen Kane's Rosebud--to clinch its point. Yet for all the hokeyness, Titanickept me absorbed all 194 minutes both times I saw it. It's nervy as well as limited for writer-director-coproducer James Cameron to reduce a historical event of this weight to a single invented love story, however touching, and then to invest that love story with plot details that range from unlikely to downright stupid. But one clear advantage of

  paring away the subplots that clog up disaster movies is that it allows one to achieve a certain elemental purity.

  This movie tells you a great deal about first class on the ship, a little bit about third class, and nothing at all about second class.According to Walter Lord's 1955 nonfiction book about the sinking of the Titanic, A Night to Remember, which includes a full passenger list, 279 of the 2,223 passengers were in second class, and 112 of them survived.

  But as far as Cameron's story is concerned--a love match between a footloose and penniless artist in third class, Jack Dawson (Leonardo DiCaprio), and a rebellious protofeminist woman in first class, Rose DeWitt Bukater (Kate Winslet), who's engaged to marry an unscrupulous zillionaire (Billy Zane)-- the omission makes perfect sense, even though it establishes that there's no middle ground between the lovers. To speak about the artistry of Titanic rather than its economics is to assume that the audience's pleasure counts for more than the investors'bank accounts--hardly the assumption that rules the current discourse about the movie. The five-page spread in the December 8 issue of Time magazine includes over three pages devoted to hand-wringing in the lead article, which is headlined "Was all the misery worth it?" That's

  followed by Richard Corliss's negative review, which occupies only two-thirds of one page and concludes, "Ultimately, Titanic will sail or sink not on its budget but on its merits as drama and spectacle. The regretful verdict here: Dead in the water." Then Cameron is allotted a final page to defend himself, though the obsession with the bottom line in the preceding onslaught forces him to devote nearly all of his rebuttal to production and business details rather than aesthetics. The package could easily have appeared in Forbes, Fortune, or Variety. Yet whose money and whose interests are actually inspiring all thisnervousness? Considering the amount of abuse that this movie dishes out to the privileged first-class passengers, isn't it possible that this is what really has Time so hot and bothered?

  I saw Titanic twice at the same theater--first with an audience of "industry people," including other reviewers, then a couple of weeks later with a less professional crowd--and the difference in the audible responses was palpable. I enjoyed the movie both times, but the second screening, unlike the first, was punctuated by gasps, laughs, and applause in all the right places, suggesting that the second crowd,which had only its own interests at stake, was a lot more receptive.It's as if I'd sat the first time with the ship's owners and the second time with the passengers.

  Morally and conceptually, this movie could almost have been made in 1912, the year the Titanic sank and the year that D.W. Griffith made Man's Genesis, The Musketeers of Pig Alley, and The NewYork Hat. I hasten to add that this was still three years before The Birth of a Nation, the picture that established features as the central attraction of moviegoing, and that there's nothing about Kate Winslet that suggests either Lillian Gish or Mary Pickford. (If her pulchritude and sass recall any silent actress of the teens, it might be Theda Bara.)

  Moreover, when Cameron resorts to Griffith-like crosscutting to build momentum, he's hamstrung by his wide-screen format, which is less amenable to fast cutting than the screen ratio Griffith had to work with, and by the wealth of visual details (such as crowds and fixtures) he has to coordinate; even Cameron's 1989 The Abyss, which worked with a simpler game plan, has better suspense sequences than this movie.

  But in terms of narrative streamlining and moral simplicity, Titanic is still a lot closer to Griffith and his era than it is to other 90s disaster films. The characterizations of heroes and villains, which appear to be drawn with the utmost sincerity, all seem cut from the same Victorian cloth as those in Griffith's melodramas--among others, there's the dreamy and selfless Irish-American artist-adventurer, the tempestuous and freethinking Philadelphia debutante, the snarling and brutal zillionaire fiance (with an improbable touch of Brando's Stanley Kowalski), and the fiance's sadistic and preying valet (David Warner).

  For better and for worse, this is a movie that appears to believe in what it's saying--and the lack of cynicism is refreshing.

  泰坦尼克号观后感英文(三)

  "Do you believe in love?" When a stranger into an acquaintance, sometimes I will ask him. If he says: don't believe. I will not alert. A person, even the love doesn't believe that his heart would not soft, not light, he will only believe in money, power, also will not believe friendship. He probably has a breakup would think so, so he must be very pessimistic: see a leaf, suspected that the whole forest withered. He may think about whether to believe in love a little bit silly, then his life will not love.

  "Do you believe in love at first sight?" When an acquaintance into a friend, I might ask him. If he says: don't believe. I feel a bit disappointed. A person, even love at first sight do not believe that his heart would not romantic, even dreamed of have no ability. What is the most sad thing? Not arrive not to dream, but have no dream! Even scoff at the dream, as the sparrow sarcastic geese: "where are you going? Not the warm South ".

  "Do you believe in life for love at first sight?" When a friend become good friends, I could not help but ask him. If he says: don't believe. I feel really sorry: how to talk about "Titanic" and he? He watched "Titanic" will not be moved. Like a hard stone, not talking rain gentleness.

  Ten years ago, see "Titanic", as it moved. Ten years later, again see "Titanic", still I moved. Even though, just sit in the room, the story takes place only at the small screen, or the same boat, the same love.

  See "Titanic" many times. Suspected human time, will look at the "Titanic". When there is nothing good movies, go over it again "Titanic". Early to write "Titanic" opinion, but this feeling is difficult to use language to express. Language is the most exquisite, is less than the film shock. Now read the text, have rarely been touched, and enjoy the film, often tears in your eyes. May only films can perfect deduce beautiful love, others are not.

  I always think: a most luxurious ship sank just to spectrum is a eternal love elegy. And a beautiful, the birth of love, but let the Titanic and the immortal, spread among the people in need of love and warmth of every heart that has faith in love.

  See "Titanic", total recall two love stories, one is Shakespeare's tragedy "Romeo and Juliet", a Chinese folk legend "Liang Shanbo and Zhu Yingtai". Is to love and respect the legend, is a beautiful love because of family pressure and burst! As long as there is the world of literature, "Romeo and Juliet" will not disappear. As long as there is a Chinese man alive, "Liang Shanbo and Zhu Yingtai" will continue to spread. As long as the movie in the world, "Titanic" must be in the numerous fans DVD, and play. Even the world without film, "Titanic" also through another medium, continued.

  "Titanic" love two love compared with the above, more pure, clean, powerful, directly into the softest deep soul. Because of the love between Jack and rose not due to secular and disillusionment, but the disaster. Such a beautiful love, in front of the pathos of the disaster, to resist the destruction, finally let disaster become its footnote. Like a flower blooming Epiphyllum, very want to open longer and longer, finally had to let wither notes it once brilliant.

  Jack and Rose's love is perfect, but they envy this perfect, wreck envy this perfect, seawater envy this perfect, so together they broke the perfect. As crystal sound, fell on the rock, crushed. See so perfect love of destruction, we cannot help tears, as if they were, in fact all cry for myself. Cry oneself once so deep love, in the life the enchanting to plump, could not resist a variety of disaster with a clang, thin, withered. So in the life the most beautiful ferry sank. Thought can borrow this leaves small boat can across the life of oliver. Who knows, it would sink, sink, and slowly sank to the sea, flood, flooded the sands of time, has been quietly drowned.


看过“泰坦尼克号观后感英文”的人还看了:

1.英文电影观后感范文

2.泰坦尼克号观后感作文

3.泰坦尼克号观后感800字

4.英语电影观后感

5.泰坦尼克号观后感

6.泰坦尼克号读后感

《泰坦尼克号观后感英文100字|泰坦尼克号观后感英文范文.doc》
将本文的Word文档下载到电脑,方便收藏和打印
推荐度:
点击下载文档

【泰坦尼克号观后感英文100字|泰坦尼克号观后感英文范文】相关文章:

建国大业观后感200字范文(精选5篇)03-29

英雄回家观后感600字(合集四篇)03-29

电影《红船》观后感小学生范文汇总五篇03-29

延安革命纪念馆观后感1500字(合集五篇)03-29

观看红船观后感汇编5篇03-29

长安的荔枝观后感锦集三篇03-28

延安革命纪念馆参观观后感(合集5篇)03-28

追梦赤子心电影观后感(合集四篇)03-28

国防军事电影观后感1000字集合4篇03-28

资助育人大国工匠进校园观后感精选4篇03-28